Also, if module were a reserved word and not already used by node.js as an identifier I MIGHT feel differently.
- Matthew Robb On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Robb <matthewwr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Because that assumes everyone needs it all the time. The nice thing about > it being opt-in is that when it comes time to use it a person has to first > learn the entry point and from then on be explicit about it. I prefer > explicitness 99% of the time because it's easier to track down for new > contributors to a code base etc. > > > - Matthew Robb > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I guess it just seems odd to me that we HAVE a system in place now for >>> importing "stuff" into a Program with an author defined local identifier >>> name and we're discussing magic like using this or module. Just make it >>> another thing the author imports inside their own module? ``` import meta >>> from "./@meta"; ``` or something in the ballpark. Let's use the system >>> we're creating to our advantage. >>> >>> >> That's true, but I don't understand why we can't just have (to use your >> example): >> >> import module from "./@meta"; >> >> As an *implicit* import within each module. >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
