Because that assumes everyone needs it all the time. The nice thing about it being opt-in is that when it comes time to use it a person has to first learn the entry point and from then on be explicit about it. I prefer explicitness 99% of the time because it's easier to track down for new contributors to a code base etc.
- Matthew Robb On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I guess it just seems odd to me that we HAVE a system in place now for >> importing "stuff" into a Program with an author defined local identifier >> name and we're discussing magic like using this or module. Just make it >> another thing the author imports inside their own module? ``` import meta >> from "./@meta"; ``` or something in the ballpark. Let's use the system >> we're creating to our advantage. >> >> > That's true, but I don't understand why we can't just have (to use your > example): > > import module from "./@meta"; > > As an *implicit* import within each module. > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
