> Axel, using `module` was the first proposal analyzed (3.1 from the gist). I > do like it a lot, but other in the meeting opposed to any sort of "automagic" > by wrapping the module execution into a function execution with the `module` > argument (a la nodejs),
Overloading `this` feels even more magic to me and is much less self-descriptive. Apart from the overloading problems (which are significant!), I don’t see that much of a difference between passing in a value for `this` and setting up a – descriptively named – module-scoped variable. > and the fact that `this` is not really the module, it is an object that > contains, among other things, a reference to another object with the live > binding, a relative import, a relative get, etc. Give it a different name, then. Call it `moduleDescriptor`, `moduleData`, etc. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de rauschma.de
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
