Meant "this message is so uninformed that...". On Sep 10, 2014 6:55 AM, "Mark S. Miller" <erig...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi L2L, this message is uninformed that I must ask you to move to another > forum, until you learn a lot more about js and web programming. This is not > the place. > On Sep 10, 2014 6:47 AM, "L2L 2L" <emanuelal...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> .... Yeah I guess I'm pretty late for that huh... No this is great, the >> more feature, the better. A lot of these feature would cause certain >> application not to be needed... In other words, use more of the language >> and less libraries.... Why you at it, how about reviving E4X? That way, we >> can lose the DOM api. After all, if ES was made for the web, than there >> should be method to access the DOM. It could be an object, like how the E4X >> was, but better. >> >> On another note, this is now becoming the mini-type >> application/JavaScript, than text/JavaScript. >> >> But consider the E4X though. >> >> E-S4L >> N-S4L >> >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:35 AM, "Sebastian Zartner" < >> sebastianzart...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I don't see why you're complaining. If you don't like the features in >> ES6, then just don't use them. The features of ES5 are still available. >> If you want to have more strict code, then add a "use strict"; statement >> to your code. >> And if you're against adding more features to the core language, then you >> should have complained several years ago at the planning of ES6. >> >> Sebastian >> >> On 10 September 2014 08:12, L2L 2L <emanuelal...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This.... These feature--most of them-- would be something I see in the >>> browser api... This is truly looking like w3c working group... >>> >>> ... But I don't see any chance of my words changing the direction of the >>> spec.... Especially when you consider the original designer of the language >>> steering this course... >>> >>> So in term, if you can't beat them, change them, might as well aid them >>> --in what I feel to be In truth, the destruction of the original syntax, >>> by the original creature of the language... Kinda wish they had a flag for >>> these new syntax to be set... At least than, those who are toward the >>> originally syntax style, would feel some sort of preservation for it-- >>> In their quest to farther add on to ES as a --application-- language. >>> >>> --as duo to a private email by /be. This to me is not trolling, I'm >>> responding to this person who respond two times to my post... So in terms, >>> I should not have to worry about being banned from the mailing list cause >>> of this message. >>> >>> E-S4L >>> N-S4L >>> >>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:17 AM, "Axel Rauschmayer" <a...@rauschma.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Now is second half of 2014, and lots of issues are not closed yet, from >>> what I see. >>> >>> >>> The spec already looks pretty complete to me and Traceur and TypeScript >>> do a pretty good job of letting you use ES6 today. >>> >>> As previously announced here, the current schedule is to be finished by >>> the end of the year, to start the publication process in March 2014 and to >>> have a standard by June 2014. >>> >>> I got delusioned as well. >>> >>> Isn't the model of big new editions of spec over; in the times we live >>> now, with two-week frequent releases? I think ES6 will never see the light >>> when taken from this approach. That's why, shouldn't the release policy be >>> changed so that: >>> >>> >>> It has already changed, but not for ES6. ECMAScript 7 and later will >>> have fixed release dates. Only features that are ready at a given date will >>> be included. >>> Background: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262 >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer >>> a...@rauschma.de >>> rauschma.de >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
