for record sake, this is my complain on missingn -> better explained: https://gist.github.com/qubyte/43e0093274e793cc82ba#comment-1292183
Rick kindly ensured me that it will be discussed for ES7, I see that too late for such little improvement able to cover 100% of use cases ( including `((x)->x)).bind(ctx)` ) Not sure what to do to make it happen sooner. Best Regards On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > but only one made it ... I am not comparing but many developers are > already confused about fat not behaving like thin. > > Yes, thin should be part of ES6 ... it's way easier to spec as just > regular anonymous `function` shortcut , I still don't understand why it has > been left out. > > The `function` AFAIK was the boring/too long problem to sugar, we've got 3 > other ways to define it in other flavors and yet not a shortcut as thin > arrow would simply be. > > Best Regards > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org> wrote: > >> Alex Kocharin wrote: >> >>> > Everybody else that used to pass a different context to do something >>> more meaningful >>> Does anyone really do that? Except for fine-tuning performance? As far >>> as I remember, people either use closures or .bind() stuff. >>> >> >> Yup. >> >> Andrea, if you want -> (which you do) can you kindly stop complaining >> that => is not ->? That's like saying blue cheese is bad because it isn't >> cheddar. Both are great! >> >> /be >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
