Yeah, and it would line up with cover grammar needed for
refutable-by-default patterns.
/be
Matthew Robb wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org
<mailto:bren...@mozilla.org>> wrote:
Did you keep backward compatibility? `x?.1:y` must continue to work.
This is why I suggested a leading operator (`?a.?b()`) because it
seems like it would have the least potential for conflict with
existing valid syntax
- Matthew Robb
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
