> > The bottom line here is that browsers aren't a place for a type safe and > > correct language (well, thy could have been but hey, such is history). > > They're a medium to consume information over the internet.
due to history, the hard-reality is that its impractical to write completely correct frontend-code because there are simply too many UX edge-cases to account for. this inconvenient truth bites non-frontend engineers everytime they try to write a "correct" browser program, and get overwhelmed by the scope of such a requirement. angular2 is a texbook example of sacrificing convenience (of angular1) for the sake of more correctness. On Jul 24, 2017 6:11 AM, "kdex" <k...@kdex.de> wrote: > For the sake of keeping our discussions clear, could we all please refrain > from flooding the entire mailing list's inbox with these unsubstantial > "+1" or > "-1" emails if they contain no meaningful contribution to the conversation? > > If you want to make a point, make your point. If not, don't. > > Much obliged! > > On Sunday, July 23, 2017 11:58:34 PM CEST kai zhu wrote: > > > On Jul 23, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Dante Federici < > c.dante.feder...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > The bottom line here is that browsers aren't a place for a type safe > and > > > correct language (well, thy could have been but hey, such is history). > > > They're a medium to consume information over the internet. > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
