> On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From my memory of the meetings and online discussions, strict mode was not
> meant to make static analysis significantly easier. More important was
> enabling Caja (now SES) to "use strict" and do less work, static and at
> runtime. Implementation and legacy loopholes continue to confound such
> efforts :-).
From my memory, static analysis of eval impact was definitely a motivator for
the strict mode eval semantics. Similarly, it was part of the motivation for
eliminating with.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
