in frontend-development, the majority of use-cases are for
small/medium-scale applications, where es6 toolings are inappropriate
due to their complexity.

"reliable, well-engineered, large-scale, performant applications" are
a niche application of javascript.  tc39 should focus on making lives
of everyday javascript programmers easier (who mainly want simple and
stable tooling for simple/moderate webapps), instead of catering to
niche people wanting google/facebook-scale apps.


On 10/27/17, Bob Myers <r...@gol.com> wrote:
> If you don't like those features or the associated tooling, then don't use
> them.
> Meanwhile, other people will be using them to build reliable,
> well-engineered, large-scale, performant applications.
> Bob
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM, kai zhu <kaizhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> tc39 is partly to blame for promoting the perception of javascript
>> language instability, which promotes tooling instability.
>>
>> generators, es modules, destructing, let, fat arrows have caused
>> tremendous harm to tooling stability, which has made
>> frontend-development hell for everyone.
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/17, Jordan Harband <ljh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > aka "how it feels to learn"?
>> >
>> > A decent response:
>> > https://medium.com/front-end-hacking/how-it-feels-to-learn-
>> javascript-in-2017-a934b801fbe
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:38 PM, J Decker <d3c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> (humor?) https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-
>> 2016-
>> >> d3a717dd577f
>> >>
>> >> It all seemed so simple....
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> es-discuss mailing list
>> >> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to