>I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make >sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
+1 I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary. Most are linked to the old UI any way.... D. On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Him > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > wrote: >> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and >> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the >> build process so that we are not part of our SVN? >> >> Here are few examples below: >> >> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup). > > This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to > http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html > but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works" in > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup > > This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the > same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good. > Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked. > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup > > This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see > http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html). > > If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be found. > > If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is fine. > > Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code be > removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL > stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here. > > I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make > sure a general review of such code is done before the release. > > -Bertrand >
