Looks like I'm in for some serious bug-testing soon :) So, just tell me when you've finished messing around so I can mess it up - Linux and OS X here !
On 29 January 2010 11:28, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > accordian isn't used but tabs are... > > maven-based solution might be more useful > > On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think we should just throw out the Accordion too, we aren't using it >> currently anyway. (it was part of the UI started last year) >> Better be safe than sorry. >> >> Thanks for going through this. >> >> /Anne >> >> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.53, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> I think we can delete the following files can be deleted: >>> >>> wz_tooltip.js + all the other js files that start with tip_ >>> >>> The files starting with "ui." appear to be jQuery scripts ( >>> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion) but do not have a license header >>> in our SVN. If you look at this link >>> (http://jqueryui.com/latest/ui/ui.core.js), you will see that they are >>> dual licensed. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Get rid of them immediately is all I have to say. >>>> We cannot have LGPL licensed scripts in our code. >>>> >>>> /Anne >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.40, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make >>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release. >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary. >>>>> Most are linked to the old UI any way.... >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Him >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and >>>>>>> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the >>>>>>> build process so that we are not part of our SVN? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are few examples below: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup). >>>>>> >>>>>> This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to >>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>>>> but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works" in >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup >>>>>> >>>>>> This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the >>>>>> same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good. >>>>>> Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup >>>>>> >>>>>> This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see >>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html). >>>>>> >>>>>> If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be >>>>>> found. >>>>>> >>>>>> If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code be >>>>>> removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL >>>>>> stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make >>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >
