accordian isn't used but tabs are... maven-based solution might be more useful
On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should just throw out the Accordion too, we aren't using it > currently anyway. (it was part of the UI started last year) > Better be safe than sorry. > > Thanks for going through this. > > /Anne > > On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.53, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> I think we can delete the following files can be deleted: >> >> wz_tooltip.js + all the other js files that start with tip_ >> >> The files starting with "ui." appear to be jQuery scripts ( >> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion) but do not have a license header >> in our SVN. If you look at this link >> (http://jqueryui.com/latest/ui/ui.core.js), you will see that they are >> dual licensed. >> >> D. >> >> >> >> >> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Get rid of them immediately is all I have to say. >>> We cannot have LGPL licensed scripts in our code. >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> >>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.40, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>> >>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make >>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release. >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary. >>>> Most are linked to the old UI any way.... >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Him >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and >>>>>> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the >>>>>> build process so that we are not part of our SVN? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are few examples below: >>>>>> >>>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup). >>>>> >>>>> This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to >>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>>> but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works" in >>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup >>>>> >>>>> This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the >>>>> same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good. >>>>> Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup >>>>> >>>>> This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see >>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html). >>>>> >>>>> If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be >>>>> found. >>>>> >>>>> If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is fine. >>>>> >>>>> Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code be >>>>> removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL >>>>> stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here. >>>>> >>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make >>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release. >>>>> >>>>> -Bertrand >>>>> >>> >>> > >
