On 2/16/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 16 févr. 07 à 01:23, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit :
> On 2/15/07, David Chisnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 15 Feb 2007, at 23:19, Yen-Ju Chen wrote:
>>
>> I'm a big fan of the FreeBSD development model. Have three
>> categories of branch:
>>
>> -CURRENT has whatever people are working on in it. Should compile.
>> Might work. Will contain bugs.
>>
>> -STABLE has the things that have been tested in -CURRENT for a bit,
>> and are probably stable but could use wider testing.
>>
>> -RELEASE is a snapshot of -STABLE with only bug fixes applied, no new
>> features. One or two -RELEASE branches prior to the current release
>> receive back-ports of bug fixes (manpower permitting).
>>
>> Ideally, devs should be running -CURRENT, testers should be running -
>> STABLE, and everyone else should be running the latest -RELEASE (or
>> an older one if they want).
>
> Since we have trunk/ and tag/ already in Etoile svn,
> they can serve as -CURRENT and -RELEASE.
> So all we need is a -STABLE, which can be branches/stable/
I'm ok with this model, perhaps /stable should go along /trunk rather
than in /branches/stable. What do you think?
You mean /stalbe and /trunk are at the same level ?
It would be great.
By the way, I start to CC this discussion on etoile-dev.
Yen-Ju
Quentin.
_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
