On 2/16/07, David Chisnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Feb 2007, at 16:35, Quentin Mathé wrote:
> I'm ok with this model, perhaps /stable should go along /trunk
> rather than in /branches/stable. What do you think?
So the top level svn view would be:
/branches/
{individual branches for individual work if people want them}
/trunk/ (main development work)
/stable/ (stuff moved from /trunk that seems to be working)
/releases/
0.2/ (current release + bug fixes)
0.3/ (next release + bug fixes)
Although it is is nice to have release branches,
I am afraid that we will not have enough man power to maintain it.
Considering the whole Etoile is still under heavy development,
my suggestion is that we only tag the -stable as release (under /tag in svn).
If there are bugs, we fix in -stable and tag it as bug-fixed release.
In that way, we only need to maintain -trunk and -stable mostly.
in other word, people have to be more careful about what they put in -stable.
Yen-Ju
...
If that's what you mean, then it sounds sensible. If not, explain
more :)
_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
