On 3/12/07, Isaiah Beerbower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should I email the GNUstep-discuss mailing list about this (since it is
partially their decision)?
NOTE: I am not apposed to developing StepTalk with the GNUstep project;
the thought had honestly just never occurred to me. The more I think
about it however, the more sense it makes.
I would say so.
You probably don't need to "develop" StepTalk.
Maintaining it up-to-date is appreciated enough.
As long as it work, you can keep most of effort
on the application you are interested.
Yen-Ju
Isaiah Beerbower
Isaiah Beerbower wrote:
> Quentin Mathé wrote:
>> Le 12 mars 07 à 20:35, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit :
>>
>>> On 3/12/07, Isaiah Beerbower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have decided to start maintaining StepTalk. Stefan Urbanek seems
>>>> to be
>>>> very open to helping me get started (thanks Stefan). I am also
>>>> planning
>>>> on doing some development on the Io bundle for StepTalk and possibly
>>>> adding it to the StepTalk package. I am open to suggestions...
>>>
>>> It is great.
>>
>> This is a very welcome help… :-) You should probably get in touch
>> with GNUstep chief maintainer since StepTalk is part of GNUstep
>> repository. You probably need to sign a FSF copyright assignment to
>> work on it.
> I was thinking about maintaining it as a separate project. StepTalk is
> released under the LGPL so this would be a valid option. *It would
> still be compatible with a plain GNUstep install*, but that way I
> could tailor it more to the needs of Etoile. I suppose working on it
> as a part of the GNUstep project is also an option which should be
> considered. I think this topic could use a little more discussion.
_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
