I say screw certification, who needs it? Those classes should be for people who want to learn and if they want to get "certified" they could do it later out of their own pocket. I've always kind of scoffed at there being a red hat "certification". All that stuff is run (or was) by collective technologies anyhow, so it should have been called coll-tech certification, or something else...but that company doesn't even take that crap too seriously, according to a friend of mine who works there. it smacks of a windows mentality to me
--- Ken Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2003 11:23, Ben Barrett wrote: > > Right! Also, Sair is another contributor to linux > > certification, although I don't know where they stand today. > > FWIW, googling "linux certification" shows LPI a number of > > times, before redhat = ) > > Remember that the bottom line for my supervisor(s) at LCC isn't > the relative merits of one cert or another, but how many people > they think would enroll for the class. > > The cost would likely be the same as the Red Hat class. > > If we offered it, is there anyone here who would actually take the > class? > > I have to get my proposals in for Fall Term classes by next > Friday. > > Thanks, > > Ken > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
