On 8 Feb 2022 at 15:07, Peri Hartman via EV wrote: > Tesla absolutely must modify FSD in some way to ensure the driver > is alert. I'm not sure how that might work ...
I agree. They might start by not creating unrealistic expectations. For example, they could call it something other than "full self driving." Maybe, oh, I dunno, "driving assistance"? "Lane-holding assistance"? I don't see how the FTC hasn't called Tesla on FSD. It smells to me like false advertising. David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it. Use my offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = The telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. -- Albert Einstein = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = _______________________________________________ Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and CC fields UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/ LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
