I think we should reduce the friction for new contributions as much as
possible, and it seems to me that "main" will cause the fewest headaches
for new developers. It's the branch name that people are starting to
expect now that Github and others have made the change. I don't really
see a compelling reason not to use "main" at this point.
Jeff
On 2022-11-01 2:01 PM, Jason Stephenson via Evergreen-dev wrote:
Hi, all.
I know calling the main branch "main" is all the rage these days, but
I'd like to ask why not call it "trunk?" It's the default for SVN and
possibly CVS, IIRC. It's also still in our configure.ac.
Cheers,
Jason
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev
