Agreed. I get the appeal of trunk; I used SVN and CVS (and a little SUP, briefly) but let's skate to where the puck is going, so to speak.
Jason > On Nov 1, 2022, at 8:06 PM, Jeff Davis via Evergreen-dev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should reduce the friction for new contributions as much as > possible, and it seems to me that "main" will cause the fewest headaches for > new developers. It's the branch name that people are starting to expect now > that Github and others have made the change. I don't really see a compelling > reason not to use "main" at this point. > > Jeff > > On 2022-11-01 2:01 PM, Jason Stephenson via Evergreen-dev wrote: >> Hi, all. >> I know calling the main branch "main" is all the rage these days, but I'd >> like to ask why not call it "trunk?" It's the default for SVN and possibly >> CVS, IIRC. It's also still in our configure.ac. >> Cheers, >> Jason >> _______________________________________________ >> Evergreen-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev > _______________________________________________ > Evergreen-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev _______________________________________________ Evergreen-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev
