Agreed; "main" appears to be the new default for Git projects that use that kind of branch structure, so I think we should just run with that.
Regards, Galen On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 8:06 PM Jeff Davis via Evergreen-dev < [email protected]> wrote: > I think we should reduce the friction for new contributions as much as > possible, and it seems to me that "main" will cause the fewest headaches > for new developers. It's the branch name that people are starting to > expect now that Github and others have made the change. I don't really > see a compelling reason not to use "main" at this point. > > Jeff > > On 2022-11-01 2:01 PM, Jason Stephenson via Evergreen-dev wrote: > > Hi, all. > > > > I know calling the main branch "main" is all the rage these days, but > > I'd like to ask why not call it "trunk?" It's the default for SVN and > > possibly CVS, IIRC. It's also still in our configure.ac. > > > > Cheers, > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > > Evergreen-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev > _______________________________________________ > Evergreen-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev > -- Galen Charlton Implementation and IT Manager Equinox Open Library Initiative [email protected] https://www.equinoxOLI.org phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) direct: 770-709-5581 <http://evergreen-ils.org>
_______________________________________________ Evergreen-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-dev
