Correct - here's a screenshot from our test system: [image: image.png]
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:18 PM Lussier, Kathy <kluss...@noblenet.org> wrote: > Thanks for the links Andrea! To be clear, the copy location group work > adds those groups as a separate filter, rather than a part of the library > selector, right? > > Kathy > -- > Kathy Lussier > she/her > Executive Director > NOBLE: North of Boston Library Exchange > Danvers, MA > 978-777-8844 x201 > www.noblenet.org > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:01 PM Andrea Buntz Neiman via Evergreen-general > <evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: > >> Chiming in to note that Equinox recently completed work on these related >> bugs: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1949109 - Add Library Groups >> to Angular Staff Catalog >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1861701 - Angular staff >> catalog copy location group filtering support >> >> We will be sharing a branch shortly. >> >> ABN >> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:39 AM Tina Ji via Evergreen-general < >> evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:09 PM Lussier, Kathy via Evergreen-general < >>> evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: >>> > #2 introduces new behavior that hasn't been used in previous staff >>> > catalogs. We could not think of a use case where an org unit >>> > should be invisible in the public catalog when performing a >>> > search, but should be visible in the staff catalog search. However, >>> > if there is one, let us know so that we can add an option, >>> > most likely a global flag. >>> >>> >>> One of our library system does central cataloguing at its headquarter, >>> which is not open to the public. It's OPAC invisible, but needed on the >>> staff catalogue. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Evergreen-general < >>> evergreen-general-boun...@list.evergreen-ils.org> on behalf of Terran >>> McCanna via Evergreen-general <evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 23, 2024 7:13 AM >>> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group < >>> evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> >>> *Cc:* Terran McCanna <tmcca...@georgialibraries.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Evergreen-general] Sharing plans for changing library >>> selector in Angular staff catalog >>> >>> About disused Org Units - even after a branch closes completely and all >>> of the active materials and patrons have been moved off of it so we don't >>> want it to appear in most dropdown lists, we sometimes still need to run >>> reports on it. It would be nice to have the option in the reporter to >>> include non-staff-visible branches. Maybe that is as simple as adding a new >>> report source in the fieldmapper that can be used instead of the normal Org >>> Unit source when desired? >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:46 PM Galen Charlton via Evergreen-general < >>> evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:09 PM Lussier, Kathy via Evergreen-general < >>> evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: >>> > #2 introduces new behavior that hasn't been used in previous staff >>> > catalogs. We could not think of a use case where an org unit >>> > should be invisible in the public catalog when performing a >>> > search, but should be visible in the staff catalog search. However, >>> > if there is one, let us know so that we can add an option, >>> > most likely a global flag. >>> >>> I can think of several: >>> >>> - Library joining a consortium. Most any migration workflow I can >>> imagine will result in a period of at least a few days, and sometimes >>> longer, where an OU exists and has holdings attached to it but shouldn't be >>> visible in the OPAC, but where staff nonetheless need to be able to do >>> staff-side searches limited to that OU. >>> - Library opening a new branch with an opening day collection. This >>> could lead to an even longer period where the OU exists but is not yet >>> ready to be visible to patrons >>> - An explicitly hidden or resource collection >>> >>> Does NOBLE have OUs that are completely disused? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Galen >>> -- >>> Galen Charlton >>> Implementation and IT Manager >>> Equinox Open Library Initiative >>> g...@equinoxoli.org >>> https://www.equinoxOLI.org >>> phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) >>> direct: 770-709-5581 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Evergreen-general mailing list >>> Evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org >>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general >>> >>> This message originated from outside the M365 organisation. Please be >>> careful with links, and don't trust messages you don't recognise. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Evergreen-general mailing list >>> Evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org >>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general >>> >> >> >> -- >> Andrea Buntz Neiman, MLS >> Project Manager for Software Development | Product Specialist >> Equinox Open Library Initiative >> abnei...@equinoxoli.org <abnei...@equinoxoli.org> >> 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) >> Direct: 770-709-5583 >> *https://www.equinoxOLI.org/ <https://www.equinoxOLI.org/>* >> _______________________________________________ >> Evergreen-general mailing list >> Evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org >> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general >> > -- Andrea Buntz Neiman, MLS Project Manager for Software Development | Product Specialist Equinox Open Library Initiative abnei...@equinoxoli.org <abnei...@equinoxoli.org> 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) Direct: 770-709-5583 *https://www.equinoxOLI.org/ <https://www.equinoxOLI.org/>*
_______________________________________________ Evergreen-general mailing list Evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general