Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > But c breaks down into: > > c1) I experience something coherent that obeys the laws of > > physics > > and > > c2) I experience wild and crazy "harry Potter" stuff. > > > > The memory-traces corresponding to c2 are a possible > > configuration of matter, and so must exist in Platonia. But > > I only experience c1. > > That means nothing... if you had experienced c2 you would never write this...
I could have experienced periods of causal stability mixed with periods of HP. I could still communicate during one of the stable periods. > and in physical MW, HP/WR are not ruled out but of very low measure which > means there is 100% chance that some instance (a tiny tiny number but at > least one) of you will experience it. Yes, yes, yes. I am objecting here to everythingism -- mathematical MW --. not physical MW. > Be it a mathematical MW or physical MW. Measure is a lot more difficult in MMW. It has to be deprived by apriori necessity. Do you have a solution? > Now if you say HP/WR are not possible in classical everett MWI, please > explain how... Some are ruled out -- because quantum laws are still laws -- some aren't. PMW is narrower than MMW, but still broader than SW. > Now if you don't agree with MW theories then it seems you are > stuck explaining why the real is only composed of that and not this... 1. If everything is contingent, there are contingent facts. 2. If everything is necessary...it is a contingent fact that everything is necessary...so there is still at least one contingent fact. 3. You can't avoid contingency. > Quentin Anciaux --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---