John, Brent, John said: > EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. >How can one use such artifact as 'evidence' that "shows..."?
Aspect Et Al tested it ages ago, see for instance here: http://www-ece.rice.edu/~kono/ELEC565/Aspect_Nature.pdf Brent said: > But the EPR experiments show that this can >only hold if the influence of "the rest of the world" is non-local >(i.e. faster than light) and hence inconsistent with relativity. QM lives well with special relativity (the physics community speaks of "peaceful coexistence") due to the fact that non-local effects can not be used for signalling. QM and Relativity only clash at the level of General Relativity (gravity)- at Black Holes and other Singularities (Big Bang). Cheers, Günther --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
