On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rex Allen <rexallen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We haven't changed the relative number of Rexs and not-Rexs, we've > just labeled them with an extra property and then rearranged them > according to that additional property. They retain their original > properties though. > > So, we still have a countable infinity of Rexs, and a countable > infinity of not-Rexs. Who can be placed into one-to-one > correspondence. > > SO...what difference does the "measure" make when deciding, as Carroll > put it, "which infinity wins"?
To me this sounds very similar to the Tristram Shandy Paradox. Yes? No? http://www.suitcaseofdreams.net/Tristram_Shandy.htm -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
