On Dec 31 2011, 10:51 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > On Dec 31, 4:17 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I thought it was obvious how they are related. A computation that doesn't > replicate > certain functions, like recognizing danger, ends up having a small measure > (if comp is true). That's part of why I don't think comp is true. I don't really see how it could conceive of danger in the first place. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
