On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:59:03 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jan 2013, at 18:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:11:01 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22 Jan 2013, at 23:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:20:58 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:49:09 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote: 
>>> >> 
>>> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com> 
>>> >> wrote: 
>>> >> > That doesn't have anything to do with your straw man of my 
>>> position. I 
>>> >> > have 
>>> >> > never once said that existence is contingent upon human 
>>> consciousness. I 
>>> >> > state again and again that it is experience itself - the capacity 
>>> for 
>>> >> > sensory-motor participation which is the progenitor of all possible 
>>> >> > forms of 
>>> >> > 'existence'. Something 'being' means that there is an experience, 
>>> >> > otherwise 
>>> >> > there is no possibility of anything ever coming into being. 
>>> >> 
>>> >> However, in a static Block MWI Universe there is no need for time or 
>>> >> consciousness or experience. 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > Then in what sense does it 'exist'? 
>>>
>>> It must be an illusion. Either that or MWI is an illusion. Doesn't 
>>> Bruno say that matter is a dream or illusion? Richard 
>>>
>>
>> I think MWI and block universe aren't even illusions, they are just ideas 
>> to defend mechanism against the fact that reality is only partially 
>> mechanistic.
>>
>>
>> Once we assume mechanism, we can explain why reality needs to be only 
>> partially mechanistic. 
>>
>
> You get the same result by assuming that mechanism only needs to be a part 
> of reality.
>  
>
>> I think that you are confusing total computable with partial computable. 
>> The universality of the Turing machine makes her behavior not total 
>> computable. In fact it makes such machine much more a new unknown, that we 
>> can invite at the discussion table, than anything like an answer.
>>
>
> The new unknown is worth exploring, for sure, but I'm only interested in 
> the integrating the realism of our direct experience with our indirect 
> scientific understanding. There may indeed be other Turning universes out 
> there, or in here, but I don't live in them yet, so I don't care. I would 
> care if I could, but my interest in science fiction has waned surprisingly 
> in the last 25 years.
>
>
>
> Mechanism is not a "part of something". It is a proposition about the 
> possibility of surviving with an artificial brain of some sort. 
>

Is there anything other than mechanism in the universe in your use of 
mechanism?
 

> Then we get a quantitative explanation of how the laws of physics 
> "evolved"---logico-arithmetically, sufficiently precise to test the 
> hypothesis. Don't confuse science-fiction and theoretical reasoning. They 
> can overlap, but are different things.
>

They are different things, but sometimes we like to think that one is the 
other.

Craig
 

>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
> Craig
>
>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/cGG3Xaa9bWYJ.
> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/Jd-t9onQ4nkJ.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to