On 28 May 2013, at 19:27, Richard Ruquist wrote:

Bruno,
In my model which you have already said is not comp,
all the computational histories happen in a mindspace
and only one of them become physical.

Yes, that is what makes it into a non-comp theory, a bit like Bohm's hidden variable theory. In that case, the notion like particles, universes, in fact the whole physical, seem to be build-in unexplainable.

Bruno




Richard


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

On 27 May 2013, at 20:44, Richard Ruquist wrote:

Bruno,
With MWI are some universes less probable than others.

Only relatively to some state, some computational histories are less probable. It is open if there is a more stringer notion of "probable universe". Actually it is an open question is the notion of physical multiverse make sense. There are only coherence conditions on (sharable) dreams. Keep in mind that I am only translating a problem in math. Then it is almost obvious it is more a platonist theology than an Aristotelian theology. No one knows which one is correct.





I have difficulty understanding how a universe can be statistical.

I have difficulty understanding how a universe can be.



I think I understand the frequency argument. But that does not make sense either.

? Feel free to explain why. I think it is simpler to forget the notion of physical universe, and to concentrate on the "computational histories" as seen by a machine/number.

Obviously, "neoneo-platonism" is very young, and an infinity of problems are awaiting us there.

Bruno





Richard


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

On 27 May 2013, at 19:10, meekerdb wrote:

On 5/27/2013 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 26 May 2013, at 20:23, meekerdb wrote:

On 5/26/2013 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 26 May 2013, at 04:00, meekerdb wrote:


Whether or not it is recorded or extractable in this universe is immaterial. If the universe is infinitely large or infinitely varied, we each reappear an infinite number of times. There are a countably infinite number of programs, and for any given level of complexity, there is a finite number of possible programs shorter than some length. Any consciousness we simulate is the consciousness of something that exists somewhere else in the infinitely varied/ infinitely large universe, and if the universe is really this big, then someone else far away could simulate you perfectly without having to extract a record of you. Just running Bruno's UDA for a long enough time "ressurects" everyone, we are all contained in that short program.


To which, one is tempted to respond: So what? If there is all this simulation going on, what reason is there to suppose it is being done by being anything like us or that the worlds in which the simulations take place (the "real" ones, if there are any) are anything like this one.

Because the FPI makes "this one" a statistical sum on all possible one.

What do you mean by "a statiscal sum"? FPI must still pick out some kind of unity; not just an average.

Why? How so?

If not, then I don't know what FPI means. I thought it referred to one's experience of being a person, but the is a unity to that experience. I experience being Brent Meeker. I don't experience being Bruno Marchal.

FPI = First Person Indeterminacy.

When you look at your body, or neighborhood, below your level of substitution what comp predicts you will see, is the trace of the infinitley many computations which go through your state. That's how the FPI makes "this one" resulting from a statistical sum.














You are simply led back to trying to discover what are possible worlds, where "possible" can be anything from "familiar enough I can understand it" to "nomologically possible" to "not containing contradictions".

Possible means "livable from a first person point of view in such a way that you would not see the difference above the substitution level".

So all simulations must look just like this??

Yes. When done at the right level (if it exists). By definition, I would say.

How does that then comport with everything happens, because it's NOT the case that everything happens here.

Every possible subjective experience happens, , related to the many computations (in arithmetic) but with different relative probabilities.

Comp makes the physical reality more solid, as it show it to rely on eternal statistics on atemporal number relations.

"Everything physical happens" is really the "p -> BDp" explained by the LUMs' theology, and it is more like "shit happens", to be short. (I explain the math on the FOAR list if you are interested).

Bruno




Brent





Below the substitution level, everyone (humans, alien, numbers ..) see the same average on all computations, which, due to the constraints of self-reference and theoretical computer science is a well structured, highly complex, mathematical object.

So what? So physics is reduced to arithmetic, or to machine theology... and this in a way which saves humans from reductionism.

I didn't know reductionism endangered us. :-)

It eliminates the person, in theory first, in camp, slavery, our gulag, after. It is a constant in human history, and it is what gives to religions (including materialist and atheist one) their bad reputation. Read La Mettrie and Sade to learn more on this.

Bruno




Brent

It makes also comp into science and out of philosophy. All this leads to a different, platonist and non aristotelian, view on "reality". It makes "Matter" into a failed hypothesis (Matter =primitive matter).

Bruno



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6358 - Release Date: 05/25/13

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list +unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6360 - Release Date: 05/26/13

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to