On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:26:45 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 02 Oct 2013, at 06:56, Pierz wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:46:17 AM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Then the reasoning shows (at a meta-level, made possible with the 
> assumption used) how consciousness and beliefs (more or less deluded) in 
> physical realities develop in arithmetic.
>

Are 'beliefs in' physical realities the same as experiencing the realism of 
public physics though? For instance, I believe that if I should avoid 
driving recklessly in the same way as I would in a driving game as I would 
in my actual car. Because my belief that the consequences of a real life 
collision are more severe than a game collision, I would drive more 
conservatively in real life. That's all ok, but a belief about consequences 
would not generate realistic qualia. If someone held a gun to my head while 
I play the racing game, the game would not become any more realistic. I 
always feel like there is an equivalence between belief and qualia which is 
being implied here that is not the case. It's along the lines of assuming 
that a hypnotic state can fully replace reality. If that were the case, of 
course, everybody would be lining up to get hypnotized.There is some 
permeability there, but I think it's simplistic to imply that the aggregate 
of all qualia arises purely from the arbitrary tokenization of beliefs.
 

>
> But that's the mathematical (arithmetical) part. In UDA it is just shown 
> that if comp is true (an hypothesis on consciousness) then physics is a 
> branch of arithmetic. More precisely a branch of the ideally 
> self-referentially correct machine's theology. (always in the Greek sense).
>
> There is no pretense that comp is true, but if it is true, the correct 
> "QM" cannot postulate the wave, it has to derive the wave from the numbers. 
> That's what UDA shows: a problem. AUDA (the machine's interview) provides 
> the only path (by Gödel, Löb, Solovay) capable of relating the truth and 
> all machine's points of view. 
>
> There will be many ways to extract physics from the numbers, but 
> interviewing the self-introspecting universal machine is the only way to 
> get not just the laws of physics, but also why it can hurt, and why a part 
> of that seems to be necessarily not functional.
>

I don't think that an interview with anyone can explain why they can hurt, 
unless you have already naturalized an expectation of pain. In other words, 
if we don't presume that universal machine experiences anything, there is 
no need to invent qualia or experience to justify any mathematical 
relation. If mathematically all that you need is non-functional, secret 
kinds of variable labels to represent machine states, I don't see why we 
should assume they are qualitative. If anything, the unity of arithmetic 
truth would demand a single sensory channel that constitutes all possible 
I/O.

Craig


> Bruno
>
>
>
>  
>
>>
>> Bruno 
>>
>>
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google   
>> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,   
>> > send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>>
>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ 
>>
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to