On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 22 Oct 2013, at 22:50, Russell Standish wrote: > > >On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> > >>On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:03, Russell Standish wrote: > >> > >>>> > >>>>In fact "p-> []p" characterizes sigma_1 completeness (by a > >>>>result by > >>>>Albert Visser), and that is why to get the proba on the UD*, we use > >>>>the intensional nuance []p & <>t (= proba) starting from G > >>>>extended > >>>>with the axiom "p-> []p" (limiting the proposition to the UD). > >>>> > >>> > >>>proba? > >> > > > >Sorry - I was actually asking what you meant by the word "proba". > > OK. Sorry. It was an abbreviation for probability. >
[]p & <>t doesn't seem like a probability. Did you mean certainty? IIRC, one of your hypostases was interpreted as probability=1 (ie certain) events. Also, is []p & <>t == []p & <>p ? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
