As I see it, the problem is connecting atmospheric disaster events to global warming. I have been looking for such a connection in the scientific literature and even in AGW blogs w/o success.
Before going into physics I was an undergraduate student of mechanical engineering. In our fluid dynamic classes we learned that if you put more energy into a turbulent system, such as the atmosphere, then the turbulent fluctuations (read storms) vastly out pace the average increase of energy (read global temp). I recall some expressions of the relationship of fluctuations to averages, but that was in the 1950s. If any of you have read of such a relationship to explain the increased intensity of storms please let me know (with both barrels) and provide a link if possible. Richard On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:25 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 November 2013 22:56, Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> This is laughable. Not a SINGLE article against human warming was >> publised in the main scientific magazines and you said that the process was >> perverted by the "deniers"? I have no option but to think that you believe >> en evil deamons with telepathic powers that try to hide your coming >> apocalypse. And you are right. I´m one of them. This night, by black >> magic, I will appear in your dreams and I will torment you. Careful whit me. >> >>> > Or you could look at TV advertising, with big expensive ads for cars, or > at the paper with pull out sections which are trying to sell cars, or you > could look at the TV news, which despite reporting virtually a new climate > related disaster every week now, hardly ever mentions that it might be > linked to global warming (unless it's to point out that "no single storn > can be directly linked to global warming" - the only mention I've heard > recently). Now add up how many people read science magazines and how many > watch car adverts on TV. > > Now maybe you can see who is in charge of shaping our opinions. > > When car ads are banned, as cigarette ads are, there may be some tiny > amount of truth in what you say. (Although by the time *that* happens, > Auckland will probably be underwater.) > > But until then, the deniers are firmly in control. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
