Thanks for the good work Jason.

Hmm... I do have a critics, which is minor or major: I don't see any difference between the beam and the attenuated beam on my screen. In fact I would avoid color, or I would still use any trick so that even on a bad black and white screen we can clearly see the differences. Some people (like me) don't see well colors. I would have been born once year later, and I would never understood anything in math, as the "modern math" reform has been done in between and it promoted the use of color on the black board, and I would have unable to understand anything. Many people don't see well colors, and are usually even unaware of the fact. Colors are OK, but it helps the color blinded a lot, when the distinction is also clear and symbolical.

I might come with more conceptual and/or pedagogical critics when I have more time.

Best,

Bruno


On 15 Nov 2013, at 08:00, Jason Resch wrote:

Telmo, Bruno,

I've incorporated your suggestions into an updated document. Thank you.

To all: feel free to use these however you find appropriate.

Jason


On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

On 10 Nov 2013, at 18:36, Jason Resch wrote:

Telmo,

Thank you very much for that feedback; those are all good points and I will incorporate it into a new and improved version.

Do you think it would be clearer if instead of a block of wood I used a very small (but light absorbing object), like a dust mote, or a single atom, etc. (something that more intuitively could be moved by light?)

Perhaps I could built up with multiple levels, first the light hits an electron, which puts it into two states, and gives it two momentums, then the electron hits a phosphorescent screen, which puts it into multiple states of illumination, and then the person looking at the screeen is finally put into two states?


That would be nice I think.

One more remark, you seem to avoid formula, at all cost, including "a(b+c) = ab+ ac". Of course I am a mathematician, and formula help them. I know some non mathematicians (and publishers) run away from any presence of formula, but it seems some simple one sum up so well what happend (cf one of Albert explanation of the interferometer ..).

Anyway, noce work!,

Bruno




Jason


On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com > wrote:
Thanks Jason, nice work!

A few comments:

- It's not obvious what's going on when the block of wood turns into
two. Even expecting the multiple outcomes, one does not intuitively
expect a beam of light to move a block of wood. I don't mind the
exaggeration but I suggest you make it explicit in the text and
indicate displacement in the figure somehow;

- Numbering figures would be a great improvement;

- You should sign your work!

Best,
Telmo.

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've put together a primer on QM, as I think in the process of explaining > something in simple terms can help improve one's understanding of a given > subject. I thought I would share it with this list in case it might help > anyone else. I also welcome any feedback anyone has to offer regarding it.
>
> Jason
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
<QM Primer.ppt><QM Primer.pdf>

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to