Brent, That seems to assume a prior existence of "quantum correlations" in a non-computational universe. Anyway it's just another unproven speculative theory. Why post it as if it proves something?
Edgar On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:35:44 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 1/9/2014 5:15 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > Stephen, > > > > PPS: A computational universe, IF it computes clock times which it must, > absolutely > > requires something besides clock time to be moving to provide the > processor cycles for > > those computations to occur within. That something is a universal > (extending across all > > of computational space) present moment time. > > No it doesn't, c.f. William K. Wooters "Time Replaced by Quantum > Correlations" IJTP v223 > n8 1984. > > > > > It simply has to exist for comp to work.... > > You suffer from a severe lack of imagination. > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
