Dear Brent,

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:27 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

>  On 1/9/2014 8:26 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
>  Dear Brent,
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:19 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>  On 1/9/2014 7:07 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>>
>> No Liz, I told you what it IS. It's the happening in computational space
>> that enables computations to take place since something has to move for
>> computations to occur. All it DOES is provide the processor cycle for
>> computations.
>>
>>  You seem to be nit picking...
>>
>>  Edgar
>>
>> On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:56:19 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
>>>
>>> No you spent them telling me what it *does*. I'd like to know what it
>>> *is.*
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 January 2014 15:54, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Common Liz, I just spent the last number of posts telling you and
>>>> Stephen what it is... Don't make me repeat myself...
>>>>
>>>
>>  I don't know why there is this concern about Edgar's computations.
>> It's seems very much like Bruno's, except Bruno's Universal computer is
>> running all possible programs (by dovetailing).
>>
>
>
>  AFAIK, I agree. I see little difference except for semantics.
>
>
>
>>  The time that appears on clocks is a computed ordering relation which
>> is conjugate to the conserved quantity called "energy".
>>
>
>  I don't know how time (the flow of event to event) or its conjugate
> emerges from either Bruno or Edgar's proposed theories. Both seem to assume
> a timeless and static domain from which everything, literally, emerges. I
> would like to better understand the mechanism of the emergence.
>
>
> Look up the paper by Wooters that I cited, or the earlier one he wrote
> with Don Page.  It's not mysterious, it's the same question to be answered
> in any block universe model.
>

I think that I have read it. I have been plowing through papers on that
subject for about 10 years now...




> The talk by Knuth you cited was a nice attempt.  As one of the commenters
> noted, it's seems questionable to base the structure on causality, but it
> seems to me that Knuth's assumption of ordering was weaker than physical
> causality.
>

Right, it is not based on causality, just ordering like 1 < 2 but for
values that are not strictly numbers. The most basic idea involved in any
interaction... It is the associativity property that generates the neat
stuff. :-)



>
> Brent
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Brent
>>   --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/TBc_y2MZV5c/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Stephen Paul King
>
> Senior Researcher
>
> Mobile: (864) 567-3099
>
> stephe...@provensecure.com
>
>  http://www.provensecure.us/
>
>
>  “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
> immediately.”
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/TBc_y2MZV5c/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 

Kindest Regards,

Stephen Paul King

Senior Researcher

Mobile: (864) 567-3099

stephe...@provensecure.com

 http://www.provensecure.us/


“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
immediately.”

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to