On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edgaro...@att.net> wrote:
> Jesse, > > Your condition C. was not example dependent. You just need to rephrase > your condition C. as two observers with no relative motion AND in identical > gravitational fields. Then it does hold and is consistent with conditions A > and B. I already gave several examples. > But I gave a different example where it leads to inconsistent conclusions, are you going to address that? In my example, Alice and Bob have no relative motion and are both in identical gravitational fields (zero gravitational fields, since this is an SR flat spacetime example). Likewise, Arlene and Bart have no relative motion and are both in identical gravitational fields (again, zero). The only comparisons I made between members of different pairs were ones that involved their passing next to each other and comparing clock readings at the same point in spacetime, so their relative motion shouldn't be an issue (I'm pretty sure you've said before that you agree that if SR predicts two clocks meet at a single point in spacetime, their two readings at that point must be simultaneous in p-time). Please just look over the Alice/Bob/Arlene/Bart example I gave at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/jFX-wTm_E_Q/pxg0VAAHJRQJand tell me if you disagree with any of the numbered conclusions about p-time simultaneity 1-4. Jesse -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
