On 12 February 2014 14:02, Russell Standish <li...@hpcoders.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:24PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > You are right, the qualia are in X1* \ X1, like we get quanta in > > S4Grz1, Z1*, X1*. > > The only thing you can say is that qualia ought to obey the axioms of > X1*\X1, (and even that supposes that Z captures all observations, > which I think is debatable), not that your model generates qualia, as > Liz was suggesting. > > There may well be other things in X1*\X1 that are not qualia. > > This is not a critique of you - I don't recall you ever claiming your > model "got qualia", I was mainly responding to Liz's comment of 11/2/14. > My unreserved apologies if I misrepresented Bruno. I was under the impression that comp has at least some sort of claim to explain qualia, but since I haven't got that far in the argument I wasn't able to say any more than I did. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
