Hi Liz

>> I meant changed from our everyday definition, in which we normally assume 
>> there is only one you, which is (or is at least associated with) your 
>> physical structure. Which we generally assume exists in one universe.

We lose that definition just by stepping into the realm of MWI don't we? Its 
not as if we can have use of it in MWI until we want to argue that we will 
always see 'spin up'. 

MWI forces upon us either the complete abandonment of any notion of personal 
identity over time, or the equal distribution of it through all the branches in 
which 'we' appear.

All the best

Chris.

From: allco...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:28:53 +0100
Subject: Re: 3-1 views (was: Re: Better Than the Chinese Room)
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com




2014-02-26 7:21 GMT+01:00 chris peck <chris_peck...@hotmail.com>:





Hi Bruno

>> Yes, it is the common confusion between 1 and 3 views.

There is no such confusion. I haven't seen anyone confusing these.

>>She should have said: "whatever she knows she will see, she should expect 
>>(with certainty!) to see SOMETHING definite". 



But, If she had of said that you'd both be wrong! 

>> And in the 1p it is obvious she will never see both outcome".

You need to stop confusing what is seen with what can be expected to be seen. I 
think that's the source of many of your mistakes. She can expect to see each 
outcome without being committed to the view that either future self sees both. 
All that 1p,3p,3-1p,1-3p stuff is a rubbishy smoke screen to divert attention 
from the simple error you make here, isn't it?



She can make a probabilistic prediction as you can make in MWI... you're the 
one wanting to say probability are wrong, but only the interpretation of what 
is probability change in MWI (and duplication settings)... not the 
prediction... if you say it is totally useless, then you're ready to make a bet 
with me (as everything for your has equal probability of happening...)


Quentin
All the best

Chris.

From: marc...@ulb.ac.be


To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 3-1 views (was: Re: Better Than the Chinese Room)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:26:02 +0100




On 25 Feb 2014, at 07:31, Quentin Anciaux wrote:


Greaves rejects subjective uncertainty. With respect to spin up and spin down 
pay special attention to the point in section 4.1 where, in discussion of a 
thought experiment formally identical to Bruno's step 3, he argues:



"What ... should Alice expect to see? Here I invoke the following premise: 
whatever she knows she will see, she should expect (with certainty!) to see. 
So, she should (with certainty) expect to see spin-up, and she should (with 
certainty) expect to see spin-down."


That's nonsense, and contrary to observed fact. 

Yes, it is the common confusion between 1 and 3 views. She should have said:



 "whatever she knows she will see, she should expect (with certainty!) to see 
SOMETHING definite". And in the 1p it is obvious she will never see both 
outcome".


Bruno
 http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



 





-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
                                          





-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger 
Hauer)






-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to