On 03 Mar 2014, at 08:32, Kim Jones wrote:


On 2 Mar 2014, at 11:03 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:


On 02 Mar 2014, at 11:13, Kim Jones wrote:



Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL

On 1 Mar 2014, at 7:43 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

and I chose numbers as people are familiarized with them.

Bruno

How about music? Music is just a bunch of numbers.

Well, you can't say that. Especially to a literally minded stubborn mathematician :)

I do agree that the relation between math and music are very deep and profound though.


Yes. Tell me: are the following equivalent statements to a literally- minded stubborn mathematician like you:

4 + 1 = 5

1 + 4 = 5

2 + 3 = 5

3 + 2 = 5

They are equivalent in many senses, and not equivalent in many other senses.

They are equivalent semantically, but then with classical semantics, all true statement are equivalent. I mean that if you have the truth that 4+1 = 5 then 1+4=5. That is: (4+1= 5 <-> 1+4=5) is true.

They are deductively equivalent in RA, PA, ZF, etc. because such theories can prove the equivalence above.

They are not equivalent in any procedural sense. adding 1 to 4 is not the same thing than adding 4 to 1. It happens that the result is the same, but the procedure is not.

In fact "equivalent" means nothing, if you don't stipulate the relation of equivalence applied.







because to a lateral-thinking, alternative-seeking musical thinker like moi they are not.

OK. But I need your equivalence relation.




You only have to perform (ie clap or tap out) 4 + 1 followed by 1 + 4 to see ( ie hear -> ratiocinate) that they are not equivalent in the musical sense.

OK, in the musical sense, assuming "+" introduce a time delay in the claps, they are not.



Give me  a shout if you cannot clap these sentences accurately.

Actually, your clap view of numbers make 1+x non equivalent with x+1 useful for the infinite ordinals.

1 + omega = omega

that is clap followed by clap clap clap clap ... is considered as equivalent to clap clap clap ... The "+" does not add delay, for the ordinal, unless there are an infinity, and so:

omega + 1 is not = to omega,

clap, clap, clap, clap, ...., clap ≠ clap, clap, clap, clap, ....,

That's a different rhythm indeed.

Bruno





K

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to