Jesse, Yes, the views are infinite on several axes, but that can be addressed simply by enumerating views at standard intervals on those axes. Or you could equally integrate over the continuous functions.
Considered together simply means you plot the correlation each frame view (at the standard intervals as above) gives and see how they cluster. Which I'm pretty sure will be around my result. You don't need to view the resulting graph from any frame as you seem to suggest, because the graph is OF the actual all frame view results. For every frame you simply calculate the apparent lack of simultaneity between two events Nonsiimultaneity=(t1-t2) and plot it relative to the simultaneity that my method claims is actual. Edgar On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 2:13:24 PM UTC-5, jessem wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net<javascript:> > > wrote: > > Jesse, > > Yes, you are right. I phrased it incorrectly. > > What I meant to say was not that each individual view was somehow > weighted, but that all views considered together would tend to cluster > around m > > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
