On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 8:33:27 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote: > > On 26 March 2014 07:33, <bs...@cornell.edu <javascript:>> wrote: > >> No organism has been found to mover neutrons around atoms. >> > > Humans have, I think ... but only in the last 100 years or so. >
Sure β but I was thinking of how it could have been that it was *not* that Cornell Biologists rejected Kevran's idea of biological transmutation (Na to Mg, K to Ca, and Mn to Fe) etc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corentin_Louis_Kervran#cite_note-8 but that they simply never had heard of the idea. Solomon Goldfein: Report 2247, *Energy Development from Elemental Transmutations in Biological Systems* -USAMERDC.- DTIC<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DTIC> No. ADA056906 <http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA056906/> Why was this unclassified report (that provides physiological basis for energy change differences on the use of nuclear force rxns in bodies) never followed up on. Many have not heard of metabiology. Mitochondria have a different genetic code than the rest of DNA so perhaps they have a different program (dyadic of attractions and repulsions per gene) capable operating with nuclear forces ( thus way beyond anything humans have done in the past 100 years). βIt was concluded that elemental transmutations were indeed occurring in life organisms and were probably accompanied by a net energy gain.β Only not only would no one have heard this they would not tend to think it in any way either. Again, the US report came out in 1978 and in 1982-86 I asked numerous biologists at Cornell about that bio-possiblity but *no one* (about 10 asked) here even had any idea what that idea was. How did a 22 year old know of something published that 44 year olds did not? Let's hope that metabiology does not suffer that fate. If it is wrong and ignored that is one thing but If the creativity is ignored because it is created and creative that is unacceptable even if this is in a science that seeks to minimize its use of apparent teleological language. In this case we are talking about designs but ones that one must imagine as different random vs. Markovian etc. This is something 22 year olds might apperceive today but 66 years be deaf and blind to. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
