Photons and electrons have internal structures both photons and electrons are made from the same things, tonnies. You will see the structures when my book arrives.
You should not have any problem with the first few pages. The first chapter is a summary of existing theories. The second chapter describes tronnies. John R. From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 3:18 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TRONNIES On 18 May 2014 07:27, John Ross <jr...@trexenterprises.com> wrote: John Clark, I assure you I am not a crackpot. I am a graduate Nuclear Engineer, a Patent Attorney and Vice President Intellectual Property of a respected corporation engaged in important scientific research and development. I am a good friend of many brilliant scientist. Most of them are also skeptical of my theory, but none of them has convinced me of any basic errors in my theory, other than it is inconsistent with existing accepted theories. We are at the Auckland Writers Festival this weekend, and just went to see last year's Man Booker prize winner, Eleanor Catton, author of "The Luminaries". And she was brilliant - wise, insightful, precise, humble, genuine. Just wonderful. Virtually the first thing she said (at the prompting of the interviewer) was to tell us about why she believes in astrology. "My publishers call it dropping the A-bomb," she said. "I know this is going to make it hard for a lot of people to take me seriously,.." Which of course it was. She was wise, insightful etc DESPITE (for some reason) believing in an ancient system of "pre-psychology" with no theoretical or empirical evidence (apart from perhaps a correlation between the season someone is born and their personality - which of course should be flipped when you switch hemispheres...) I wanted to shout "FFS, Eleanor, just use it as a clever structuring device, don't actually believe it!" - but perhaps she couldn't have written the book had she done that. Why do I mention this? Well, I trust I don't have to spell out the parallel, but just in case, obviously you have friends who look at you as I regarded Ms Catton. You may well be wise and insightful, you seem a nice person from what one can judge online - and you happen to believe in what is looking rather like a crackpot theory (at least I keep asking you to prove otherwise, so far without success). I have developed my “Theory of Everything “ through 13 years of hard work. Like all theories (like the relativity theories and the standard model) my theory may or may not be correct. It is certainly not generally accepted by the scientific community like relativity and the standard model are. The scientific community is not yet even aware of my theory. Other than my own friends and family, this chat group is the first people to be aware of it. This group has asked a lot of good questions all of which I have tried to answer quickly; however, to my knowledge no one in this group has read my book. It is available at Amazon.com. And I have offered to send copies to several of this group who have appeared to be seriously interested in my theory. I honestly believe my theory is a great improvement over the standard model and relativity theories. But I am not absolutely certain of that. Time will tell. I will have a look at it. Either I will find that I have so many questions after the first few pages that I need to come online and deluge you, or I will find that (imho) you really have something. My bet is on the former, but I would love to be proved wrong. In the meantime, Richard Feynman’s father was on the right track and Richard Feynman’s answer was not a good one. Richard was correct that the photon was not in the atom. The photons that his father was talking about are much too large to fit in an atom. However, as I have explained several times to this group the energy part of the photon is an entron. The entron is two tronnies traveling in a circle at pi/2 times the speed of light. The diameter d’ of the entron circle is: d’ = λ/1431 so most entrons can easily fit inside and atom and there are many entrons inside of atoms. There are even entrons inside of the nuclei of atoms. When entrons escape from atoms or their nuclei they do so as photons. A photon is an entron traveling in a circle at twice the speed of light and forward at the speed of light as I have explained before. A photon is a "medium of energy exchange" as far as I know. It can be created and destroyed, as various particles can, from energy. The photon happens to be its own antiparticle and hence when you create one it's akin to an electron-positron pair. It may have internal structure we're unaware of, of course - maybe even the one you suggest. But I would like to kow the reasoning that leads to that conclusion! :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
