John Clark,
I assure you I am not a crackpot. I am a graduate Nuclear Engineer, a Patent Attorney and Vice President Intellectual Property of a respected corporation engaged in important scientific research and development. I am a good friend of many brilliant scientist. Most of them are also skeptical of my theory, but none of them has convinced me of any basic errors in my theory, other than it is inconsistent with existing accepted theories. I have developed my “Theory of Everything “ through 13 years of hard work. Like all theories (like the relativity theories and the standard model) my theory may or may not be correct. It is certainly not generally accepted by the scientific community like relativity and the standard model are. The scientific community is not yet even aware of my theory. Other than my own friends and family, this chat group is the first people to be aware of it. This group has asked a lot of good questions all of which I have tried to answer quickly; however, to my knowledge no one in this group has read my book. It is available at Amazon.com. And I have offered to send copies to several of this group who have appeared to be seriously interested in my theory. I honestly believe my theory is a great improvement over the standard model and relativity theories. But I am not absolutely certain of that. Time will tell. In the meantime, Richard Feynman’s father was on the right track and Richard Feynman’s answer was not a good one. Richard was correct that the photon was not in the atom. The photons that his father was talking about are much too large to fit in an atom. However, as I have explained several times to this group the energy part of the photon is an entron. The entron is two tronnies traveling in a circle at pi/2 times the speed of light. The diameter d’ of the entron circle is: d’ = λ/1431 so most entrons can easily fit inside and atom and there are many entrons inside of atoms. There are even entrons inside of the nuclei of atoms. When entrons escape from atoms or their nuclei they do so as photons. A photon is an entron traveling in a circle at twice the speed of light and forward at the speed of light as I have explained before. Gamma ray photons are entrons released from the nuclei of atoms and visible light photons are mostly entrons released from the electrons orbiting the nucleus of atoms. I should not do this since your comments have been so nasty; however, believe it or not I appreciate them, since it gives me a chance explain details of my theory publically to a serious skeptic. So I make the same offer to you that I have made to others. I will mail you a copy of my book free of charge if you will let me have your address. If you don’t want to publish your address, you can call me at 858-646-5488 and leave your address on my voice recorder. I won’t even ask you to agree to read it although I would hope you would. John Ross From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:31 AM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TRONNIES On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:35 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apparently gamme rays are emitted by nuclei when they drop from an excited > state to a lower energy state (much as a lower energy photon can be emitted > when an electron in an atom moves from a high to a low energy state). Hence > what the atom had beforehand was excess energy (in some form). Here is what Richard Feynman said about that when his father asked him a question about physics: He said, "I understand that when an atom makes a transition from one state to another, it emits a particle called a photon." "That's right," I said. He says, "Is the photon in the atom ahead of time?" "No, there's no photon beforehand." "Well," he says, "where does it come from, then? How does it come out?" I tried to explain it to him -- that photon numbers aren't conserved; they're just created by the motion of the electron -- but I couldn't explain it very well. I said, "It's like the sound I'm making now: it wasn't in me before." (It's not like my little boy, who suddenly announced one day, when he was very young, that he could no longer say a certain word -- the word turned out to be "cat" -- because his "word bag" had run out of the word. There's no word bag that makes you use up words as they come out; in the same sense, there's no "photon bag" in an atom.) > I must say it is ominous that you [John Ross] are consistently failing to > answer my questions about the reasoning behind all of this At this point the cause of all this evasion and lack of logic is obvious, John Ross is a certified card carrying crackpot. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
