Chris, let me reflect to '2' words. (I never studied QM, have some glimpse
as a polymer chemist, so I do NOT argue against the theory)

1. *Parallel *

In what sense are 'universes' compared to be deemed parallel?
I presume in my agnostic views that there may be many more visions in which
2 systems may be deemed parallel (or: antiparallel?)
They may diverge in time, spacial extension, forcefields, lifespan, etc.
etc.
In my narrative (I never called it a 'theory') the perfectly symmetrical
and equilibrated "Plenitude" (imaginary vision of Everything in balance)
there are inevitably items getting grouped together in a way that violates
the perfect symmetrical distribution (complexities?) and I called those
'universes'. They re-dissipate into the perfect symmetry right as they
formed (in our case: viewed from the INSIDE as a long long time in our
Space-Time views).
Such 'universes' have different compositions according to the items forming
them, at least I did not project/propose any rules to their composition.
We know nothing about the Plenitude (word taken from Plato).

2.a quote from the URL:* 'microscopic'*

*(Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the
microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter.) *

'Microscopic to what? to our human sizes? to the sub-Planck, or the
galaxy-size extensions?
Again my agnostic views: who knows what "worlds" do exist in quite
different orders of magnitude from our habituel rulers?

Just tasting words

John Mikes




Read more at:
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html#jCp

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:04 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Sounds a lot like MWI, but asserts that the parallel universe's subtle
> interactions explain the weirdness of quantum mecahnics
>
>
>
> Read more at:
> http://phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html#jCp
>
> Griffith University academics are challenging the foundations of quantum
> science with a radical new theory based on the existence of, and
> interactions between, parallel universes.
>
> In a paper published in the prestigious journal *Physical Review X*,
> Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr Michael Hall from Griffith's Centre for
> Quantum Dynamics, and Dr Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of
> California, take interacting parallel worlds out of the realm of science
> fiction and into that of hard science.
> The team proposes that parallel universes really exist, and that they
> interact. That is, rather than evolving independently, nearby worlds
> influence one another by a subtle force of repulsion. They show that such
> an interaction could explain everything that is bizarre about quantum
> mechanics <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+mechanics/>
> Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the
> microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter. But it is
> notoriously difficult to fathom, exhibiting weird phenomena which seem to
> violate the laws of cause and effect.
> As the eminent American theoretical physicist Richard Feynman once noted:
> "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
> However, the "Many-Interacting Worlds" approach developed at Griffith
> University provides a new and daring perspective on this baffling field.
> "The idea of parallel universes <http://phys.org/tags/parallel+universes/> in
> quantum mechanics has been around since 1957," says Professor Wiseman.
> "In the well-known "Many-Worlds Interpretation", each universe branches
> into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made. All
> possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the
> dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised
> by the Portuguese.
> "But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do
> not influence our universe at all. On this score, our "Many Interacting
> Worlds" approach is completely different, as its name implies."
> Professor Wiseman and his colleagues propose that:
>
>    - The universe we experience is just one of a gigantic number of
>    worlds. Some are almost identical to ours while most are very different;
>    - All of these worlds are equally real, exist continuously through
>    time, and possess precisely defined properties;
>    - All quantum phenomena arise from a universal force of repulsion
>    between 'nearby' (i.e. similar) worlds which tends to make them more
>    dissimilar.
>
> Dr Hall says the "Many-Interacting Worlds" theory may even create the
> extraordinary possibility of testing for the existence of other worlds.
> "The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world our theory
> reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of
> worlds it reproduces quantum mechanics," he says.
> "In between it predicts something new that is neither Newton's theory nor 
> quantum
> theory <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+theory/>.
> "We also believe that, in providing a new mental picture of quantum
> effects, it will be useful in planning experiments to test and exploit quantum
> phenomena <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+phenomena/>."
> The ability to approximate quantum evolution using a finite number of
> worlds could have significant ramifications in molecular dynamics, which is
> important for understanding chemical reactions and the action of drugs.
> Professor Bill Poirier, Distinguished Professor of Chemistry at Texas Tech
> University, has observed: "These are great ideas, not only conceptually,
> but also with regard to the new numerical breakthroughs they are almost
> certain to engender."
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to