On Friday, November 7, 2014 11:26:41 PM UTC, JohnM wrote:
>
> Bruno wwrote: 
> 'science is agnostic,, that's why we need to put back theology in science, 
> so that we can develop agnostic theories or narratives, precise enough to 
> show them wrong, and progress...
> Did I misunderstand it? we developp FAITH (theology) in agnostically 
> developed theories and progress by showing them wrong?  so we may 'believe' 
> what is proven wrong - only? 
>
> Then again 
>
> John Mikes <jam...@gmail.com>:
>> To: everything-list <everyth...@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Sat, Nov 1, 2014 3:09 pm
>> Subject: Re: Do parallel universes really exist, and interact
>> Spudy: did anyone ever realize a "contact" with those "other" universes, 
>> so you can decry a 'possibility' of such?
>> Same for 'immortality': did anyone ever meet an 'immortal'?
>> JM
>>
>  
>   Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:18 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <
> everyth...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> JM:
>> to both cases no! But I have never piloted an SR-71, nor, circled the 
>> star Antares. I was going for the optimistic side of scientific 
>> speculation, rather than the everyday. Having said that, you, from my point 
>> of view-made your point. If we're speaking of our species and its 
>> descendents, why not go for the highest hanging fruit?
>>
>> So we should join the crowd of "physical Universe" figment believers who 
> just churn round and round the wise explanations of misunderstood phenomena 
> since the old Greeks (maybe longer ago)? What you say is all to believe the 
> figments (their "nth consequences" upon the mth explanations)  what "Saint 
> Science" teaches? 
> True: human technology is miraculous, but so is the swimming skills of 
> fish and hunting habits of the tiger. Or and ant hill in action.
> By establishing what we don't believe (agnostically) we never get further 
> ahead. 
>
>
 

> BTW I am studying the differences between the meaning how diverse 
> languages use 'anticipate', 'presume', 'expect', 'assume', and some more in 
> (a creative?) progressing - into new domains. How do we learn "new"? 
>
>  
It's a good of words between one another. 

Funnily enough I've been down this road or one like it. Same concept sets, 
boundaries in play, big questions about newness. 
By the looks of what you just said....buckle up, you've got  a long journey 
to go. It's a years one that. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to