If it were the momentum or velocity the mean would be zero, but it wouldn't be exponential. If you just considered the speed (absolute magnitude of velocity) in a particular direction you get an exponential distribution. Is that what the graph represents?

Brent

On 11/20/2014 5:03 PM, LizR wrote:
The average kinetic energy of an air molecule is zero, I imagine, because they're all travelling in different directions and cancel out? Or doesn't it work like that?

On 21 November 2014 13:09, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    On 11/20/2014 3:57 PM, George wrote:

    Thanks Bruno, Liz and Richard for your responses.

    The topic is extremely controversial… It took me a few months of sleepless 
nights
    to come to term with these ideas…. but let reason prevail. I am looking 
forward to
    an open and rational discussion… a background in statistical thermodynamics 
would
    be helpful.

    Bruno, you may not be able to download my pdf file because your Adobe 
Reader is not
    up to date. If you wish I could simply attach these files to my email. 
Please let
    me know. You asked me to summarize my post. The best way is with pictures 
taken
    from my
    
paper#2.https://sites.google.com/a/entropicpower.com/entropicpower-com/Thermoelectric_Adiabatic_Effects_Due_to_Non-Maxwellian_Carrier_Distribution.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
    (Currently under review)

    Figure 7 shows what happens to the energy distribution of a Maxwellian gas 
(e.g.
    air) as molecules rise from ground level (red) to a given altitude (blue). 
Kinetic
    energy is converted to potential energy and the distribution shifts to the 
left.


    Am I correctly interpreting this curve as showing that the kinetic energy
    probability density function is an exponential; so that the most probable 
kinetic
    energy for an air molecule is zero??  Why isn't it the Maxwell-Boltzmann 
distribution?

    Brent


    However when the distribution is renormalized as shown in Figure 8, the 
original
    distribution is recovered, implying that the gas is isothermal with 
elevation. The
    Second Law is upheld and Loschmidt is proven wrong….. but only with respect 
to
    Maxwellian gases.

    Now see what happens when a Fermi-Dirac gas (carriers in a semiconductor) is
    subjected to a force field as shown in Figure 9. The distribution is 
shifted to the
    left as elevation increases. However, renormalization does not recover the 
original
    distribution because it is not exponential. The lower elevation has a higher
    temperature than the higher elevation. The Second Law is broken. This 
effect can
    only be observed in high quality thermoelectric materials (Caltech 
experiment).

    I have made this calculator program and a simulator publicly available at 
my web site.

    *Figure. 7.* Un-normalized Maxwell distribution at ground (red/thick) and at
    non-zero elevation (blue/thin) showing a shift to a lower kinetic energy, a 
drop in
    density and a drop in temperature.

    *Figure. 8.* Renormalized shifted Maxwell distribution at non-zero elevation
    (blue/thin) is identical to original non-shifted distribution at ground 
level
    (red/thick).

    **

    *Figure. 11.* Un-normalized Fermi-Dirac distribution at ground (red/thick) 
and
    non-zero elevation (blue/thin) showing drop in density and drop in 
temperature.

    *Figure. 12.* Renormalized Fermi-Dirac distributions at ground level 
(red/thick)
    and at elevation (blue/thin) are different. Elevation lowers energy and 
temperature
    of gas.

    Please look on the right of the pictures for the temperatures at the 
ceiling and at
    the floor.

    George Levy



-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to
    everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to