On 27 March 2015 at 19:28, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ab asurdo is showing computationalism is incompatible with physical > supervenience, not that it is true. Yes sorry, "reject" was a poor choice of words. I meant argue from the comp position rather than the materialist one, and know what I'm talking about. > In the end by being forced to accept consciousness must supervene on the > movie + broken gate... If you believe it, then you've abandon > computationalism as a theory of the mind as the movie+broken gates is not a > computation... Or you can keep computationalism and abandon physical > supervenience.... QED Yes I realise that. The same applies to Maudlin. All I wanted to know at the moment was how the contradiction arises in the MGA. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
