On 21 April 2015 at 14:15, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Russell Standish wrote: > >> >> There is another way of looking at this. Assume a robust ontology, so >> that the UD actually runs completely. Then the closest continuation >> theory coupled with computationalism predicts the absence of any >> discontinuities of experience, such as what I experience evry night >> going to sleep. That is because in UD*, there will be always be a >> closer continuation to one you're currently experiencing (for >> essentially the same reason that there is always another real number >> lying between any two real numbers you care to pick. >> > > That seems to be saying that there is always a continuer who never sleeps. Don't dreams count? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
