On 9/09/2015 2:33 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 9 September 2015 at 14:28, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:

    On 9/09/2015 2:20 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
    On 9 September 2015 at 13:40, Bruce Kellett
    <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:

        On 9/09/2015 1:20 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
        On 9 September 2015 at 12:44, Bruce Kellett
        <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
        <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:

            On 9/09/2015 12:26 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
            On 9 September 2015 at 10:43, Bruce Kellett
            <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
            <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:


                Whether or not all possibilities are realized, they
                are not in evidence, so their relevance to the
                question of probabilities is questionable.

                Your simple model case of a coin toss causing a
                world split is just a made-up example to give the
                result you want, so again its relevance is dubious.
                There is no sensible physical theory in which the
                world splits on classical coin tosses.


            If you can't imagine a world split, consider a virtual
            reality in which the program forks every time a coin is
            tossed, one fork seeing heads and the other tails. You
            are an observer in this world and you have this
            information, so you know for certain that "all
            possibilities are realised" when the coin is tossed.
            What would you say about your expectation of seeing heads?
            I presume you mean that the world is duplicated on each
            toss, with one branch showing each outcome. We are back
            to the dreaded "person duplication" problem. My opinion
            on this is that on such a duplication, two new persons
            are created, so the probability that the original person
            will see either heads or tails is precisely zero,
            because that person no longer exists after the duplication.


        After the coin has been tossed a few times, you (or one of
        the entities identifying as you) will say that, despite the
        opinion he expressed on 9th September on the Everything
        List, it does seem that he has survived the duplication and
        that heads comes up about half the time.
        It is a question whether it is just the person who is
        duplicated, or whether it is the whole world split into two
        non-communicating replicates. In the former case, two new
        persons are created and they will experience normal
        probabilistic outcomes of coin tosses. The second case
        (duplicate, non-interacting worlds), is indistinguishable
        from a simple series of coin tosses in this one world --
        duplication has added nothing.


    What if you are locked in a prison cell isolated from the world,
    and the prison cell is duplicated without your knowledge? What if
    in a year you are released and meet your duplicate? What if you
    are never released but are informed of the duplication?
    You can make any number of artificial scenarios that appear to
    imply almost anything you want. Whereas, actually, they imply
    nothing at all, because such artificial scenarios have nothing to
    do with the real world.

    If under these duplication scenarios you are fooled into thinking
    that you have not been duplicated, then you might think that you
    have continued as the same unique person. You would, however, be
    mistaken in that belief. Nothing unusual here -- most people have
    mistaken beliefs about any number of things.


You could also claim that you are fooled into thinking that you have continued as the same unique person in everyday life, since the matter constituting your body has changed. It's arbitrary to say that in the everyday life scenario you have survived while in other duplication scenarios you only have the delusional belief that you have survived.
Not at all. In everyday life there is a continuity of body as well as of thought and memory. Plus the all important fact that the continuer is unique. Immediately you introduce a non-uniqueness into the continuer(s), you destroy the conditions for continued personal identity.

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to