On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:02:56 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Apr 2017, at 06:08, Russell Standish wrote: 
>
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:49:51AM +0200, Telmo Menezes wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Ok, so you are rejecting computationalism. Computationalism is the 
> >> hypothesis that our mind supervenes on computations (sorry Bruno,   
> >> it's 
> >> easier to write for the purpose of this discussion :). You are 
> >> declaring that mind supervene on the physical brain. 
> > 
> > That is not it at all. We've clarified with Bruno many times that 
> > computational supervenience is compatible with physical 
> > supervenience. 
>
> It should be if computationalism is correct, and if we are not deadly   
> wrong in physics. 
>

Russell is the pope of comp from this day onwards?

"Comp entraƮne SUP-COMP" is no more. 

No more spare change weakening the notion of physical supervenience 
(states, possible proximity relations) as special cases of computational 
supervenience, because by hypothesis *we survive the computational capture 
of the same*. 

Comp entraƮne whatever the boss prefers, and if it doesn't, then it "would 
be so much the worse for computationalism." Whoa-ho-ho-ho! PGC

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to