On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 3:43:21 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict 
> exact outcomes, thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an 
> INCONSISTENCY in the postulates of QM? TIA.
>

Does the Heisenberg or Feynman formulation of QM (Matrix Mechanics and Path 
Integral respectively) have any issues analogous to the collapse problem of 
Standard QM (aka the Copenhagen Interpretation)? TIA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to