On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 5:39:34 PM UTC, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:55 PM, <agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote > >> *> when you factor into consideration that non locality persists in the >> many worlds postulated -- assuming you accept Bruce's analysis -- what >> exactly has been gained by asserting the MWI?* > > What has been gained is that in the MWI you don’t have to explain exactly > what a observation is >
Aren't observations made in the MWI? Must be a new version you just invented. Also, as I have repeatedly stated, no need to bring in consciousness to QM. How many times must I remind you that Feynman explained that very clearly. AG > or how consciousness works because they have nothing to due with it. We > assume the fundamental laws of physics are the same for matter that is > conscious and matter that is not, the Schrodinger wave equation says > nothing about it collapsing when a “measurement is observed” (whatever that > means), it was just stuck in there by the Copenhagen people. > >> > *The MWI has no testable consequences* > > That is not true. You demanded I provide such a test before and I did so > on a post to this list on December 14 2017. At the time your only comment > was "Never heard this before". > Please repeat it. AG > *> Even one copy of an observer with same history as "original" observer >> is too much for me.* > > That could be but the universe doesn’t care if you like it or not. > It's a question of ornate or not, or in good taste or not. Boils down maybe to Occam's Razor. AG > John K Clark > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
